When writing an article or a column that explores a potentially heated subject, it's almost always a good idea to read into the ideologies of the opposing perspectives – that is, the backing arguments behind those who support the subject, and those who oppose the topic of discussion.
Take the salaries of professional sports players and actors, for instance. When writing an opinion piece on this subject matter (that is if you find yourself in this position), ask yourself, "Do I feel that professional sports players and actors are overpaid? Why or why not?"
On one end of the court (couldn't resist the pun, so deal with it), there are those who argue that these athletes and actors are paid too much, based on ethical reasoning and economic importance of their occupations. The collective argument on this side, is that salaries and contract earnings of sports players are far too high, because of reasons including intense personal greed on the part of the athletes, and legal action taken by their agents.
On the other hand, some argue that the amount actors and professional athletes are paid is perfectly justified, due to the difficulty of reaching the professional level in sports and Hollywood. People on this side of the argument would raise the points that these professionals are an asset in making money for an entire business and local economy, not just a team. Additionally, this side of the argument raises points about athletes being paid high amounts because their names sell tickets, and because overpayment is only possible when a particular market cannot support those who are involved without losing money.
As it stands, this debate seems as though it will only continue to persist without progressive action on either side. Until then, however, movies will still be made for the big screen, and tickets will continue to be sold for ball games.
No comments:
Post a Comment